Select Language:
English Français Nederlands

Branch Project

Contact us Sitemap
What is BRANCH about
Working together across Europe
What will Branch achieve
What is available now?
Tools for Planners

Further information

Article 10 of the Habitats Directive discusses the improvement of spatial connectivity in Europe's biodiversity through a spatially coherent network. To implement this in the Netherlands, Dutch nature policy has developed a national vision to guide the realisation of a National Ecological Network.

The objectives of the network are: to increase carrying capacity of nature areas (increasing the area and improving the quality of natural habitats) and to increase the coherence of the nature areas (this is the density of the network and the permeability of the landscape).

This network consists of core ecological areas, buffer zones and robust ecological connections.

One of 12 such robust connection or 'corridor' is located in the province of Limburg. BRANCH assessed the sustainability of this corridor to maintain spatial coherence under a changing climate. The creation of these connections aims to help secure biodiversity at national, regional and local levels, but they can also provide space for recreation and water management.

Limburg

In this case study partners tested the effectiveness of a robust corridor being created in the southern Dutch province of Limburg as part of the Dutch National Ecological Network. The corridor is intended to improve links between habitat patches in the Dutch National Ecological Network and the Natura 2000 network along both sides of the Dutch-German border (see chapter 3, Annex 4, Final report, ).

Partners carried out vegetation and breeding bird surveys (see broedvogels.limburg.nl/site/planten/start.HTM) and created habitat maps for Limburg province and the neighbouring part of Germany. The SMALLSTEPS model was used to analyse how freely wildlife could move between habitats. Finally, partners used the LARCH model to produce maps that showed how climate change could improve or reduce the sustainability of the habitat networks of selected species, with and without the robust corridor.

Output maps for species modelled are available (see annex 4 of the final report) for:

Main Image Sand lizard. Sarah Gardiner; Sustainable habitat networks for the Sand lizard without (middle) and with (right) the robust corridor in place. Alterra

Modelling results show that the robust corridor is most effective for ground-living and small flying species. It is less important for larger birds because they do not have a problem covering this sort of distance.

The design of robust corridors should focus on the species they are intended to help. Key factors to consider are: the dispersal capacity of a species and its potential distribution in a changing climate. The effects of a corridor should be monitored and the design changed where necessary.

<< Terrestrial options for adaptation